User talk:Soxra

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2339/veneyes.png



Cerberus (Boss)

 * It's obvious I confused you... What I want is the boss infobox of Cerberus separated into tabs for KH & KHII, using the above picture for the KHII tab. Is this good enough? Also, I changed the welcome template, according to the one you made--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   20:58, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Mhhh... No, on a second thought, forget it Soxy. It will be too much work... I'll just stick that pic in the article... Thank you, though :3--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   21:05, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but should we have gallery pages for Boss only enemies like Cerberus, or the Rock Titan? I think that they should have the gallery int he article itself, right? And no, you did not burst my bubble, but it was quite a revolutionary move if we do that for all bosses ^^ --'''  Dark-   EnigmaXIII   21:11, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * I think so too... after all, a boss article should not really include personality or apperance... However, we have so little info of some of them that is almost redundant to even add it... but if you really want to go on with it, you have my support. Also, soon, I would like to have a meeting with the staff again, to discuss this, and a new image policy... I will advise you with time. There, we could her our fellow staff opinion (But we are admin, so we are GOD :P kidding)--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   21:26, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Probably thursday, considering DS and FR schedules...--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   21:33, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Then, it will be tonight! I'll change the site notice.--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   21:38, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Header Template
It will be a good idea, dontcha thing? :3--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   22:15, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Awesome! They also look a little bit more... stylished ^^--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   22:33, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, they did not called the attention in the center, but now, you can clearly see them. Also, Soxy, do you see the site notice? I dismissed it a long time ago, and I dont know how to put it up again T_T Do you see the message to the staff?--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   22:40, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Perfect!! :D by any chance, do you know how to make the message re-appear for me? DX --''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   22:44, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, mister root of all coding!^^--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   22:54, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Stuff
Hey, Soxra! I've got about an hour to spare and I was wondering if you wanted any help with the boss/character articles. It seems like a big job to handle by yourself, but hey, there is a reason why you're an admin, after all! 04:47, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Alright, sounds simple. Just to clarify, is every boss getting a page? 04:57, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Wow, okay. So, for a boss that doesn't have a character article, how do I go about creating one? Haha, just so you know, I ask a lot of questions, to make sure I don't muck anything up. XD 05:25, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much for explaining that so well! I'll get straight on it! 05:35, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Alright, I did Darkside and Darkside (Boss), can you check them so I know I'm on the right track? Aso, are the boss nav's copied to the main article as well (eg )? 05:47, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Origin or etymology? 05:54, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Do you think Possessor be renamed to Possessor and Thresholder? 06:25, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Cool, it's done. Also, all Pureblood Heartless are done! Yay! 06:32, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry, I will. ;D I'll get through at least half of the Emblem Heartless first, and then I'll probably log off for the night. 06:36, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Err, did you get my above message? And what work did you want to be done on the character articles? 02:57, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Haha, okay. And thanks for taking care of the Tidus etc page, as well. Just let me know if you need any help! XP 03:30, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Renders
Imma goint to kill Rox for requesting DS model >.< --''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   21:37, July 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Darkside - DONE
 * Dark Thorn - DONE
 * Vanitas - DONE
 * Vanitas Remnant - REJECTED
 * New VR version #1 - REJECTED
 * New VR version #2 - REJECTED
 * New VR version # 3 - DONE
 * No Heart - DONE
 * Can't you use this one? - DONE
 * Unnamed Heartless - DONE
 * You are gonna LOVE this one... - DONE
 * Dunno...

Galleries
It was before the bosses got their character articles, when I was against creating galleries for boss articles--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   18:30, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * You wont have to :P Legend Aqua and the others already created them again :3--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   18:32, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Marked for deletetion. It was a crappy screnshoot anyway... Also, add No Heart to your list :3--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   18:36, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry... I do have my reasons to keep it like that though... I would rather not move it.--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   19:23, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * You see... I am not a SE animation team... I make mistakes... and you would see an animation mistake if I rotate it...--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   19:26, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Very funny :P I do the best I can--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   19:29, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

It's awesome ^^ Also, should I do an action render of the Armor of the Master, or a non-action one? And could you please do... whatever yo do to this render to the Unnamed Heartless one?--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   19:44, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's my old Armor of the Master render that I replaced with the current one. You can re-upload it if you want :3--''' Dark-   EnigmaXIII   19:55, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

V-Cast game and canonicity...
Listen, I'll bow to your wishes if you're absolutely dead-set on this, but let's look at the facts for a moment.

Was it officially endorsed by a company with ownership of the franchise? Yes.

Was it ever said in any official capacity to be non-canon? No.

Then why do we consider it non-canon? The only explanations I've ever seen are:

"Square didn't make it." So? Since when has that been a litmus test for canonicity? Fans came up with it. No official rule for what is or is not canonical has ever been set forth.

"The story is never referenced again." Why would it be? The whole thing was a dream. A magically induced dream, yes, but Sora doesn't know that. Why would he ever bring it up? Why would Maleficent ever bring it up? It's never referenced because nothing resulted from it. Doesn't mean it didn't happen.

"It sucks." I'm not going to dignify that with a response.

Now, it's probably worth noting that the fandom at large disregards the game (because it does), but to say flat-out and without qualification that it is not canon is simply untrue, largely because we don't know what canon is. In the absence of an official rule, the only surefire way to identify something as non-canon is if it shows blatant contradictions to an otherwise consistent body of work. This game doesn't show that. It's an innocuous side-story that can slide easily into the first game.Johnboy3434 21:23, July 25, 2011 (UTC)